Blind RFPs were built for a different era when IT, BPO, and captive models were new, terminology was fuzzy, and target baselines didn’t exist.
For mature sourcing decisions, forcing every need through a blind RFP produces predictable tripe:
✔ Comparable responses
✖ Differentiated thinking
✖ Context-aware solutions
True sourcing maturity is knowing WHEN NOT TO to default to traditional RFP motions.
Most of HEX’s 2025 Managed Services engagements focused on Asset Monetization, from incumbency re-solutioning / re-platforming to contract recasting spanning hardware, software, services, and data assets and AIOps.
If your assets aren’t paying their way, it’s time to RETHINK how you manage them.
For more playbooks and perspectives, see:
https://hexadvisory.com/blog/category/perspectives
GCC is not a standalone utopia.
It’s the coming together of people, process, and governance — tethered in a clear operating model. And without change management, even the best-architected GCC will crumble from within.
Here’s what we see in failed setups:
→ Competitors gain ground while you’re stuck in internal debates
→ Talent resists, then exits
→ Operations stutter and CXOs scramble
→ Stakeholders lose faith — and funding follows
→ Institutional knowledge evaporates
→ Brand takes hits that PR can’t fix
Reality vs. Rhetoric gap is HUGE in this space.
If you think trends, webinars, and research reports will prepare your enterprise for GCC transformation — you’re wrong. Change management is the new cost of entry.
HEX Advisory Group specializes in hands-on GCC execution with referenceable CXO clients, senior sourcing practitioners like Alison Armstrong, MSM MIS who helped us put together this POV from her experience from her client engagements over the years.
Source: LinkedIn
Simply put, 90% of enterprises fail to strategically harness the possibilities of Tech-first (AI-first managed services) and Talent-first (GCC) models. They bluntly squeeze vendors for cost and shift volumes (capacity) to fill up GCCs while calling it “strategy”.
Well, it isn’t. It’s simply capacity reshuffling.
Source: LinkedIn
GCCs obsess over people, skills, and operating leverage.
CIOs obsess over platforms, automation, and stability.
Neither is wrong. But value creation accelerates only when both priorities are stitched into a single execution fabric. That’s where enterprises find predictability, scalability, and smarter investment decisions.
This is the new sweet spot: people-first engines powering technology-first mandates.
Source: LinkedIn